fix: Handle bigints properly in more cases#3345
Merged
josdejong merged 5 commits intojosdejong:developfrom Jan 24, 2025
Merged
Conversation
* Allow a bigint to appear in a max/min of nonhomogeneous arguments
* If randomInt is called with a bigint or a pair of bigints, return
a bigint.
* Preserve uniformity of results if randomInt is called with a very large
range.
* Extend log, log2, and log10 to bigints
* Add tests for all of the above issues.
* Bonus: fix one JSDoc comment issue. If every PR fixes one, we will soon
get through the 150+
Collaborator
Author
|
OK, I believe I have incorporated all feedback and gotten this PR back into a good state. Thanks for your review. |
josdejong
approved these changes
Jan 24, 2025
Owner
josdejong
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the updates Glen, I'll merge the PR now
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
smallerandlarger.Resolves #3344.